Case No. MSC17-02529 SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTION BY THIRD PARTIES DAVID HAMMOND AND HAL SEIBERT TO PROPOSED STIPULATED JUDGMENT BETWEEN INTERVENORS AND U.S. BANK

As shown in the original Objection, this Court has already received voluminous evidence that the public is benefitted by an easement on U.S. Bank’s property. That evidence was submitted in connection with then-Cross Complainant Winston Cervantes Opposition to the Intervenors’ Motion for Summary Judgment, and the Court acknowledged such evidence and determined that triable issues of fact were clearly present regarding the existence of the public easement on U.S. Bank’s property (then owned by Bahrami). Read Supplemental Objection below (PDF).

MSC17-02529 – Supplemental Objection by 3rd Party D Hammond and H Seibert to Proposed Stip Judgment Stamped (2)